I’ve been experimenting with recycled and bio-based filament, and the practical headache is always the profile: nozzle and bed temperatures, flow, drying, and some indication of expected strength. Moisture alone can turn a promising spool into unpredictable prints, especially with hygroscopic materials.
Vendor profiles can reduce failed prints and clogged hot ends, and I understand why manufacturers want a curated, standardized path. But mandatory approval also risks material lock-in, while cloud-linked workflows raise a reasonable concern about workshop data leaving the local network.
My preferred compromise is a portable profile format stored on the printer or an SD card, with optional community validation rather than vendor permission. Profiles could carry composition, temperature, drying, flow, hardware requirements, and strength-test conditions. Would you trust community-maintained profiles, and what metadata should be the minimum?