I’m increasingly uneasy with consent being reduced to ticking separate boxes for a watch, phone, and smart-home system. A plausible design could combine heart rate, movement, sleep, voice, and room-presence signals to infer stress, illness, fatigue, or household routines—even if each device processes data locally and keeps little raw data.
The convenience is real, and combined health signals might produce useful wellness insights. But local processing feels less meaningful if the resulting behavioral profile, rather than the recordings themselves, still leaves the home. “Personalization” is too vague for this. I’d rather explicitly approve named inferences or combinations, such as sleep-plus-heart-rate for fatigue, and be able to revoke them separately.
Would an inference allowlist, a visible sensor-fusion indicator, or another control work in practice? Disagree, or share a real example.